Karl Harms, Employee/Appellant, v. E & L Wright Brick & Block, Employer/Respondent, and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Insurer/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Karl Harms, Employee/Appellant, v. E & L Wright Brick & Block, Employer/Respondent, and American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Insurer/Respondent. Case Number: 72437 Handdown Date: 12/16/1997 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: James E. Lownsdale Counsel for Respondent: Todd D. Hilliker Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Claimant, Karl Harms, appeals from a workers' compensation award issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission. The order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.