Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Louis J. Rasse, Respondent/Appellant v. GE Capital Small Business Finance Corporation, Appellant/Respondent.

Decision date: UnknownWD58709

Parties & Roles

Appellant
GE Capital Small Business Finance Corporation, Appellant/·Louis J. Rasse, Respondent/

Disposition

Mixed outcome

  • {"type":"affirmed","scope":null}
  • {"type":"reversed","scope":null}

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar corporate law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Corporate Law
Discuss a Similar Corporate Law Matter(314) 710-2740
View Original on courts.mo.gov

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Louis J. Rasse, Respondent/Appellant v. GE Capital Small Business Finance Corporation, Appellant/Respondent. Case Number: WD58709 & WD58738 Handdown Date: 07/09/2002 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Saline County, Hon. Frank D. Connett, Jr. Counsel for Appellant: Thomas B. Weaver, Jeffery T. McPherson and Cynthia A. Sciuto Counsel for Respondent: Patrick K. McMonigle and Patrick J. Kaine Opinion Summary: Withdrawn Citation: Opinion Author: Victor C. Howard, Judge Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART SUBJECT TO REMITTITUR, AND REVERSED IN PART. Smith, P.J., and Holliger, J., concur. Opinion: Opinion Withdrawn. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.