Machinery, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v Hale Design/Build, Inc., Defendant/Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Machinery, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v Hale Design/Build, Inc., Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 71841 Handdown Date: 03/03/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Robert Lee Campbell Counsel for Appellant: William James O'Herin Counsel for Respondent: Gregory P. White Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan, C.J.,Teitelman, J. and Blackmar, Sr.J. Opinion: ORDER Subcontractor appeals the judgment granting motion to enforce its settlement with contractor and owner. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.