OTT LAW

Mary Julia Detter, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Schnuck Markets, Inc., Defendant/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Mary Julia Detter, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Schnuck Markets, Inc., Defendant/Respondent. Case Number: 73361 Handdown Date: 06/30/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Robert H. Dierker, Jr. Counsel for Appellant: Paul J. Passanante and Joan M. Tanner Counsel for Respondent: Russell F. Watters, Michael B. Maguire, T. Michael Ward and Bart B. Zuckerman Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell, and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Plaintiff appeals from summary judgment entered against her on her claim against supermarket to recover damages for injuries suffered when she was assaulted, battered, and robbed by an unknown assailant on supermarket's parking lot. We affirm. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions