Michael Frank, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Timothy Noble, Defendant/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Michael Frank, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Timothy Noble, Defendant/Respondent. Case Number: 73859 Handdown Date: 10/27/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Angela Turner Quigless Counsel for Appellant: Norton Y. Beilenson and Don V. Kelly Counsel for Respondent: Mark H. Neill Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Simon, P.J., Knaup Crane and Mooney, JJ., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Michael Frank (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of Timothy Noble (defendant) on plaintiff's claim for breach of contract. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. Because an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use of the parties involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.