OTT LAW

Michael Shelley, Defendant/Respondent, v. Arrow Motors, Inc., Third Party Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Michael Shelley, Defendant/Respondent, v. Arrow Motors, Inc., Third Party Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 71368 Handdown Date: 11/11/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Carolyn C. Whittington Counsel for Appellant: William F. Whealen, Jr. Counsel for Respondent: James F. McMullin Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for plaintiff in a fraudulent misrepresentation case. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions