In re: Joseph V. Neill, Respondent(2024)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 9, 2024#SC100211
Decision date: Unknown
Affirmed
Procedural posture: unknown
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Legal Help
This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.
HANDDOWN LIST FOR DECEMBER 24, 2024 The following cases were affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b) and issued per curiam: 86322 Justin M. Donovan vs. State of Missouri 86590 Michael L. Gibbons vs. State of Missouri 86638 Prentis E. Boles vs. Union Pacific Railroad Company 86992 William C. O'Tool vs. Kelly Morriss 87019 In the Interest of: C.W. vs. Juvenile Officer 87341 Jasmine K. Ashour vs. Division of Employment Security
The following cases were affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) and issued per curiam: 86416 State of Missouri vs. Noah James Sobrekken 86540 State of Missouri vs. Eric E. Hams 86683 State of Missouri vs. Zachary James Glenn 86894 State of Missouri vs. Jamie Rable
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Rule 30.25
Rule 84.16
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 9, 2024#SC100211
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictOctober 24, 2023#ED111038
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080
McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.
Read The Criminal Law GuideGuideSupreme Court of MissouriDecember 29, 2025#SC101374
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 16, 2025#ED113083
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 16, 2025#ED113332