Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)
Decision date: UnknownSD34668
Opinion
JUNE 28, 2017
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b).
- Case No. SD34668
Re: IN THE INTEREST OF: E.R.D., a child under seventeen years of age. CAMDEN COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE, Petitioner-Respondent, vs. B.R.S., Respondent-Appellant.
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b).
- Case No. SD34424
Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent, vs. JOSHUA SHANE VAUGHAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Related Opinions
Rodney Lee Lincoln, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2014)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2104#ED100987
criminal-lawmajority4,922 words
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080
criminal-lawmajority3,374 words
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782
criminal-lawmajority1,516 words
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218
criminal-lawmajority3,993 words
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Elizabeth M. Speer, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED113172
criminal-lawmajority4,420 words