Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownWD73940

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar employment law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Employment LawCriminal Law
Discuss a Similar Employment Law Matter(314) 710-2740
View Original on courts.mo.gov

Opinion

SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM --------------------------------------------------------------------------- WD73940 Derrick L. Toombs vs. State of Missouri WD74084 Philip A. Wilson vs. Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement System WD74176 David C. Walton vs. State of Missouri WD74593 In the Interest of: E.K.P.; L.P. (Mother) vs. Juvenile Officer; Missouri Childrens Division WD74693 Insurtec, Inc. vs. Vicki Liley and Division of Employment Security WD74733 Consolidated with WD74693 WD74787 Tracey Jenkins vs. Division of Employment Security

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b) AND ISSUED PER CURIAM --------------------------------------------------------------------------- WD73427 State of Missouri vs. Orlando Omar Cruz WD73526 State of Missouri vs. Woodrow Dillard, Jr. WD73670 State of Missouri vs. James J. Mahone WD74118 State of Missouri vs. Christopher C. Hagedorn

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

Kathryn Torre-Stewart, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. The Washington University-St. Louis, Respondent/Defendant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 24, 2026#ED113602

affirmed

The court affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff's disability discrimination and hostile work environment claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act because she failed to plead facts demonstrating legal disability or a hostile work environment based on disability. However, the court reversed and remanded the retaliation claim, finding that plaintiff alleged sufficient facts establishing the elements of retaliation under the Act based on her complaints of disability discrimination.

Read The Employment Law GuideGuide
Civil Litigationper_curiam7,351 words
Read opinion