OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91162

Opinion

NOVEMBER 17, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91162 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V COLLIN M. TRAMBLE, APP
  1. ED91265 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KENNETH WATKINS, APP
  1. ED91350 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V HORACE CHILTON, APP
  1. ED91660 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KAREEM MARTIN, APP
  1. ED91672 RICHARD A. MAYFIELD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91698 DERYL L. JONES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED91866 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BRYANT L. JONES, APP
  1. ED91987 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V PATRICK TOBIAS, APP
  1. ED92199 CORNELL CAMPBELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92221 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JAMES WHITE, APP

NOVEMBER 17, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92312 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LYNDON JONES, APP
  1. ED92314 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DERRICK SMITH, APP
  1. ED92327 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KAREEM LEE, APP
  1. ED92335 VAN SIMMONS, APP V UNION PACIFIC COMPANY, RES
  1. ED92348 PAUL ROBINSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92384 TIMOTHY BAUER, APP V OMR CORPORATION, RES
  1. ED92565 DAMAN SPICER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92793 JAMES A GARDNER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92963 IN THE INTEREST OF: D.D.F.
  1. ED93219 JAMES ANDREWS, APP V CITY OF GLENDALE, ET AL, RES

NOVEMBER 17, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED93248 DANIEL W. FOSTER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

CORRECTION

  1. ED92984 MONIKKI WILLIAMS, APP V ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR, RES

Related Opinions