OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED94012

Opinion

FEBRUARY 22, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94012 DENNIS RUSSELL, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94284 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CARJUAN ADKINS, APP
  1. ED94331 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SHELTON M. LARKIN, APP
  1. ED94348 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LONZO CUMINGS, APP
  1. ED94367 DIONYSUS SOUBASIS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94383 CARL JEROME WILLIAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,

RES

  1. ED94442 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V KENNETH EVANS, APP
  1. ED94504 ERNA JOHNSTON, APP V UNION ELECTRIC CO, RES
  1. ED94588 WILBERT HUNTER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94642 CURTIS LEIBLE, RES V TG MISSOURI CORPORATION, APP

FEBRUARY 22, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94697 ANTHONY WILSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94742 DONALD LEE YOUNG, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94751 JEANETTE NORMAN-RILEY, RES V CHARLES RILEY, APP
  1. ED94765 AARON BRADFORD, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94909 TERRY WOODS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94949 REGINALD MOSES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94954 THOMAS MCGEE, APP STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94984 TIFFANY ANDERSON, APP V UNIV OF MO ST LOUIS, RES
  1. ED95058 ANDRE NEAL, APP V CONVERGYS CUST MGMT, RES
  1. ED95109 FELICIA MOORE, APP V GC SERVICES LIMITED, RES

FEBRUARY 22, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95117 DONALD GRAHAM, JR., APP V ISP SPECIALTY, RES
  1. ED95207 BRYAN M TULLOCK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95212 GLENN WILLIAMS JR, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95298 NORMAN DAVIS JR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95325 KATISHA REESE, APP V MCCORMACK BARON RAGAN,

RES

CORRECTION

  1. ED95058 ANDRE NEAL, APP V CONVERGYS CUST MGMT, RES

Related Opinions