OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED95950

Opinion

FEBRUARY 21, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95950 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTHONY CLAY, APP
  1. ED96124 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LARSHON WILKINS, APP
  1. ED96227 BILLIE HALE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96289 RICHARD SIMMONS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96296 GEORGE WELLS, JR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96310 J.T.V., RES V M.A.L., APP
  1. ED96313 MEDICINE SHOPPE INT'L, RES V SEM ENTERPRISES, APP
  1. ED96380 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V STEPHEN RIGGINS, APP
  1. ED96476 IRVEN WHITE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96604 BRANDY MABERY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

FEBRUARY 21, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96758 TERESA M. SOSKIN, RES V ALAN R. SOSKIN, APP
  1. ED96767 PAULINA A. MUELLER, RES V DOUGLAS L. MUELLER, APP
  1. ED96768 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V EDWARD TRAMBLE, APP
  1. ED96787 CITY OF ST LOUIS, RES V JEFFREY FAHRENKAMP, APP
  1. ED96979 JEFFREY JACKS, APP V MARKET EXPRESS, INC., RES
  1. ED97000 T. DELLBRINGGE,RES V AB EMPLOYEES CREDIT

UNION,APP

  1. ED97034 RAYMOND BAKER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97081 J.T.V., RES V M.A.L., APP
  1. ED97148 IN THE INTEREST OF: A.R., ET AL.

Related Opinions