St. Louis Counsel
OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED95950

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

View Original on courts.mo.gov

Opinion

FEBRUARY 21, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95950 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTHONY CLAY, APP
  1. ED96124 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LARSHON WILKINS, APP
  1. ED96227 BILLIE HALE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96289 RICHARD SIMMONS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96296 GEORGE WELLS, JR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96310 J.T.V., RES V M.A.L., APP
  1. ED96313 MEDICINE SHOPPE INT'L, RES V SEM ENTERPRISES, APP
  1. ED96380 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V STEPHEN RIGGINS, APP
  1. ED96476 IRVEN WHITE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96604 BRANDY MABERY, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

FEBRUARY 21, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96758 TERESA M. SOSKIN, RES V ALAN R. SOSKIN, APP
  1. ED96767 PAULINA A. MUELLER, RES V DOUGLAS L. MUELLER, APP
  1. ED96768 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V EDWARD TRAMBLE, APP
  1. ED96787 CITY OF ST LOUIS, RES V JEFFREY FAHRENKAMP, APP
  1. ED96979 JEFFREY JACKS, APP V MARKET EXPRESS, INC., RES
  1. ED97000 T. DELLBRINGGE,RES V AB EMPLOYEES CREDIT

UNION,APP

  1. ED97034 RAYMOND BAKER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97081 J.T.V., RES V M.A.L., APP
  1. ED97148 IN THE INTEREST OF: A.R., ET AL.

Related Opinions

Kathryn Torre-Stewart, Appellant/Plaintiff, v. The Washington University-St. Louis, Respondent/Defendant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 24, 2026#ED113602

affirmed

The court affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff's disability discrimination and hostile work environment claims under the Missouri Human Rights Act because she failed to plead facts demonstrating legal disability or a hostile work environment based on disability. However, the court reversed and remanded the retaliation claim, finding that plaintiff alleged sufficient facts establishing the elements of retaliation under the Act based on her complaints of disability discrimination.

employmentper_curiam7,351 words

Karla K. Allsberry, Appellant, vs. Patrick S. Flynn, et al., Respondents.(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 23, 2025#ED113270

affirmed
employmentmajority5,996 words

Connie Haworth vs. Guest Services, Inc., et al.(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictNovember 25, 2025#WD87623

affirmed
employmentmajority5,221 words

Victoria Amrine vs. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Employer, and Division of Employment Security(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictNovember 25, 2025#WD88066

affirmed
employmentmajority4,304 words

Phillip Weeks, Appellant, vs. City of St. Louis, Respondent.(2025)

Supreme Court of MissouriNovember 4, 2025#SC101018

affirmed
employmentmajority1,936 words