Pipat Auksarawrongrot and Pragarmast Auksarawrongrot, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. St. Louis Labor Health Institute, Defendant/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Pipat Auksarawrongrot and Pragarmast Auksarawrongrot, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. St. Louis Labor Health Institute, Defendant/Respondent. Case Number: No. 71001 Handdown Date: 09/09/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Jack L. Koehr Counsel for Appellant: John A. Walsh, Jr. Counsel for Respondent: Peter F. Spataro and Gregory T. Mueller Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, JJ., concur. Opinion:

ORDER Pipat and Pragarmast Auksarawrongrot ("Parents") appeal from a judgment in favor of St. Louis Labor Health Institute ("Institute") in their wrongful death claim against Institute. On appeal, Parents contend (1) that the instructions submitted to the jury deprived them of their right to due process, and (2) that the court erred in making comments which supplemented or modified the MAI instructions. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.