Richard Barber, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Richard Barber, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 71039 Handdown Date: 07/08/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Anna Forder Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, and Gaertner, JJ. Opinion:

O R D E R Appellant, Richard Barber, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.