St. Louis Investment Properties, Inc., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Mary E. Rericha and the Mary Elisabeth Rericha Trust, UTA, dtd 10/12/84, Mary E. Rericha and Lawrence J. Rericha, Trustees, Defendants/Respondents.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: St. Louis Investment Properties, Inc., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Mary E. Rericha and the Mary Elisabeth Rericha Trust, UTA, dtd 10/12/84, Mary E. Rericha and Lawrence J. Rericha, Trustees, Defendants/Respondents. Case Number: 72749 Handdown Date: 03/24/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Daniel J. O'Toole Counsel for Appellant: Mark B. Leadlove Counsel for Respondent: Charles M. Shepherd Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER St. Louis Investment Properties, Inc. (Lessee) appeals the trial court's judgment granting a motion for summary judgment filed by Mary E. Rericha (Rericha) and The Mary Elisabeth Rericha Trust (Lessor). In its first point, Lessee argues the trial court erred in finding a lease was properly forfeited by Lessor. In its second point, Lessee argues the trial court erred in finding Lessee was unjustly enriched. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.