OTT LAW

Stanley Moore, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Stanley Moore, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent Case Number: 72248 Handdown Date: 02/10/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Bernhardt C. Drumm, III Counsel for Appellant: David Hemingway Counsel for Respondent: Meghan J. Stephens Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, Robert G., Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J. Opinion: ORDER Stanley Moore, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions