OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles Mulikey, Defendant-Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Charles Mulikey, Defendant-
Respondent
State of Missouri, Plaintiff-

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles Mulikey, Defendant-Appellant. Case Number: 72744 Handdown Date: 03/31/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Emmett M. O'Brien Counsel for Appellant: A. Renae Adamson Counsel for Respondent: Karen L. Kramer Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Appellant, Charles Mulikey, appeals from the judgment and sentence entered upon his conviction by a jury trial of assault in the first degree, section 565.050 RSMo 1994, armed criminal action, section 571.015 RSMo 1994, and possession of an explosive device, section 571.020 RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal. We find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.