OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Keith Bain, Defendant-Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Keith Bain, Defendant-Appellant. Case Number: 71961 Handdown Date: 10/14/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Kenneth M. Weinstock Counsel for Appellant: Irene Karnes Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, & Cheryl A. Caponegro Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon, and Hoff, JJ. Opinion: ORDER Defendant appeals the judgment entered pursuant to his jury conviction for four counts of forgery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions