OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Chaun Harvell, Defendant/Appellant. Chaun Harvell, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Decision date: April 15, 1997

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Chaun Harvell, Defendant/Appellant. Chaun Harvell, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. Case Number: Consolidated No. 68831 Handdown Date: 06/03/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Daniel J. O'Toole Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before Russell, P.J., Simon and Karohl JJ. Opinion: Substitute for Order Filed: April 15, 1997

O R D E R Chaun Harvell (defendant) appeals from his sentence of concurrent terms of thirty years imprisonment for robbery and kidnaping and consecutive terms of five years for two counts of armed criminal action following a jury's verdict. The written sentence and judgment is corrected to reflect the two counts of armed criminal action are to be served concurrent to each other but consecutive to the robbery and kidnaping sentences to be consistent with the oral pronouncement of sentence and the total number of years imposed on the written sentence. In addition, defendant

appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the basis for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions