OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph Heidebur, Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Joseph Heidebur, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: No. 70530 Handdown Date: 06/03/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Madison County, Hon. Stanley J. Murphy Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, J. and Gaertner, J. Opinion:

O R D E R Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of sodomy, section 566.060, RSMo 1994. The court sentenced him in accordance with the jury's assessment to a prison term of five years. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions