OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard L. Kutrip, Defendant/Appellant. Richard Kutrip, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Richard L. Kutrip, Defendant/Appellant. Richard Kutrip, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. Case Number: 68320 and 71318 Handdown Date: 04/21/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Charles County, Hon. Frank Conrad, Hon. Lucy Rauch Counsel for Appellant: Raymond Capelovitch Counsel for Respondent: Jill C. LaHue Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER A jury convicted defendant of two felony counts of sale of a controlled substance. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of ten and twenty-four years imprisonment. Defendant also sought post-conviction relief in the motion court pursuant to Rule 29.15. Following a hearing, the motion court denied the motion. On this consolidated appeal, defendant raises two points challenging the trial court's and motion court's decisions. We have studied the briefs, legal file, and transcript. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgments and sentences are affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25 and 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions