State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Roger A. Curtis, Defendant/Appellant, Roger A. Curtis, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Roger A. Curtis, Defendant/Appellant, Roger A. Curtis, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. Case Number: 71620 & 71621 Handdown Date: 10/21/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Lincoln County, Hon. Ralph Jaynes Counsel for Appellant: Gwenda R. Robertson Counsel for Respondent: John Munson Morris & David R. Truman Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Reinhard, P.J., Karohl, and Dowd, Jr., JJ. Opinion: O R D E R Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions by a jury of tampering with physical evidence, section 575.100, RSMo 1994, resisting arrest, section 575.150, RSMo 1994, and possession of a controlled substance, section 195.202, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced defendant as a prior and persistent offender under section 558.016, RSMo 1994, to seven years, five years, and ninety days for each charge, respectively, to be served consecutively. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.