OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terrell Williams, Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Terrell Williams, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 73551 Handdown Date: 09/15/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Phillip J. Sweeney Counsel for Appellant: Ellen H. Flottman Counsel for Respondent: Karen L. Kramer Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. J. Dowd, P.J., Crahan and Teitelman, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant Terrell Williams appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of second degree murder, in violation of section 565.021.1(2) RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, in violation of section 571.015 RSMo 1994. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in overruling defense counsel's objection to the rebuttal testimony of the prosecutor's investigator in that the testimony was inadmissible under Supreme Court Rule 24.02(d)(5). As defendant failed to include this error in his motion for new trial, review is for plain error. We have examined the briefs and the record on appeal and find no manifest injustice. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would serve no precedential or jurisprudential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions