State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Trevin Gamble, Defendant/Appellant. Trevin Gamble, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Trevin Gamble, Defendant/·Trevin Gamble, Defendant/Appellant. Trevin Gamble, Movant, v. State of Missouri
- Respondent
- State of Missouri, Plaintiff/
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Trevin Gamble, Defendant/Appellant. Trevin Gamble, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 67897 Handdown Date: 06/24/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before Crane, P.J. and Smith and Pudlowski, J.J. Opinion:
O R D E R Defendant appeals from conviction of first degree murder, assault in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. He was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of probation or parole on the murder conviction and three concurrent terms of seven years on the assault and armed criminal action convictions. This appeal is consolidated with an appeal from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The judgments of conviction are affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Rules
- Rule 29.15cited
Rule 29.15
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
- Rule 84.16cited
Rule 84.16
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ervin Lampley, Appellant. Ervin Lampley, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Darry Taylor, Defendant/Appellant. Darry Taylor, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Defendant/Appellant. Exzanthanese N. Roberts, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Damon A. Harmon, Defendant/Appellant. Damon A. Harmon, Movant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Demortheriv Hill, Appellant. Demortheriv Hill, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. George Barton, Appellant.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District