State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hubert Holmes, Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Hubert Holmes, Appellant. Case Number: 52081 and 54502 Handdown Date: 06/02/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Boone County, Hon. Sanford F. Conley, IV Counsel for Appellant: Kent Denzel Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ellis, P.J., Lowenstein and Riederer, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Appellant-Movant was convicted of robbery first degree, armed criminal action, resisting arrest, and possession of a controlled substance. On direct appeal he seeks reversal, under plain error, for the prosecutor's closing argument. In his Rule 29.15 appeal he asserts counsel was incompetent for failure to object in closing argument, and for failing to seek a change of venue based on pretrial publicity. Judgments affirmed. Rule 30.25 (b) and Rule 84.16 (b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.