OTT LAW

Tyrone Reading, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Tyrone Reading, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent Case Number: 72514 Handdown Date: 01/27/1998 Appeal From: The Circuit Court of Monroe County, Hon. Ronald R. McKenzie Counsel for Appellant: Irene Karns Counsel for Respondent: Breck K. Burgess Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crahan, C.J., Teitelman, J., and Blackmar, Sr.J. Opinion: ORDER Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record provided on appeal and we conclude the motion court's finding is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions