Union Seventy Partnership, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Mark Twain Bank, Defendant/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Union Seventy Partnership, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Mark Twain Bank, Defendant/Respondent. Case Number: 73773 Handdown Date: 10/27/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Robert H. Dierker, Jr. Counsel for Appellant: Rexford H. Caruthers and Steven Dyer Counsel for Respondent: E. Michael Murphy and Henry F. Luepke Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, C.J., Crandall and Ahrens, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Plaintiffs, Union Seventy Partnership, et al., appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Mark Twain Bank, in an action for breach of contract and misrepresentation. We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.