Missouri Case Party

Diane Peterson, Et Al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: diane-peterson-et-al
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Employment Law

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Employment Law Civil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Employment Consultation Call About A Employment Claim

Cases Involving Diane Peterson, Et Al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Robynn Saucier Crawford vs. Diane Peterson, Et Al.

Respondent

Robynn Saucier Crawford appealed the circuit court's dismissal of her petition against employees of the Jackson County Medical Examiner's Office, which alleged various claims related to the handling of her estranged husband's body. The trial court had dismissed her petition with prejudice based on the statute of limitations. The appellate court dismissed Crawford's appeal due to numerous and persistent briefing deficiencies, specifically violations of Rule 84.04, even after she was given an opportunity to correct them.

Employment Law Civil Litigation