Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

KIMBERLY CLARK, Respondent-Respondent, LORETTA ROUSE and REBECCA ALLEN, Intervenors- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
kimberly-clark-respondentrespondent-loretta-rouse-and-rebecca-allen-intervenors
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving KIMBERLY CLARK, Respondent-Respondent, LORETTA ROUSE and REBECCA ALLEN, Intervenors-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Gregory Lee appealed orders approving the final settlement and discharge of conservator Loretta Rouse, and challenged an earlier judgment appointing a guardian and conservator for his mother, Shirley Butler. Lee argued the initial judgment was void due to due process violations and that the final settlement was void for lack of a hearing on his objections and non-compliance with statutory receipt requirements. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Lee's appeal of the initial judgment was untimely and he lacked standing to assert his mother's due process rights. The court further found no statutory requirement for a hearing on final settlement objections and that the discharge receipt requirements were satisfied.