Missouri Case Party

T.K., M.K., and R.R. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: tk-mk-and-rr
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Family Law

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Family Law Civil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Family Consultation Call About A Family Claim

Cases Involving T.K., M.K., and R.R.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 18, 2023

S.K., Et al. vs. T.K., M.K., and R.R.

Respondent

S.K. appealed the trial court's judgments declaring her and T.K. (her former spouse) as the natural parents of their two children, conceived via artificial insemination with donor sperm. S.K. argued the trial court misapplied the Uniform Parentage Act. The appellate court dismissed the appeals for lack of jurisdiction, finding the judgments were not final because they did not resolve all claims in the petitions, specifically those related to custody, child support, and parenting plans.

Family Law Civil Litigation