Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Wade Curtis Brandl, Individually and as Next Friend for H.C.B. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
wade-curtis-brandl-individually-and-as-next-friend-for-hcb
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Wade Curtis Brandl, Individually and as Next Friend for H.C.B.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Wade Curtis Brandl, Individually and as Next Friend for H.C.B. vs. Adria Sophia Anderson

Appellant

Wade Brandl (Father) appealed the trial court's judgment concerning the parentage, support, and custody of his son with Adria Anderson (Mother). Father challenged the trial court's orders regarding the child's private school attendance, the allocation of tuition costs, and the omission of a designated address for education and mailing purposes. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's rulings on school choice and tuition, finding them supported by substantial evidence. However, the court remanded the case, instructing the trial court to amend its judgment to designate a parent's residence as the child's address for education and mailing, along with the required best interest findings.