Billy Woody, Movant/Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Billy Woody, Movant/Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. Case Number: Nos. 70486 & 70523 Handdown Date: 05/20/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Edward M. Peek Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam. Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Opinion: Modified from Order Filed: April 22, 1997

Before: Reinhard, P.J., Gaertner, J., and Russell, J. O R D E R Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum

for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.