OTT LAW

Byron Ewing, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Byron Ewing, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 72548 Handdown Date: 03/10/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Maura B. McShane Counsel for Appellant: Dave Hemingway Counsel for Respondent: Jill C. LaHue Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, J.J., concur. Opinion: Byron Ewing, Movant, appeals from the judgment entered denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions