OTT LAW

Colleen Stephens, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Harold L. Stephens, Respondent-Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Colleen Stephens, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Harold L. Stephens, Respondent-Appellant. Case Number: No. 70700 Handdown Date: 08/05/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Brenda Stith Loftin Counsel for Appellant: Joseph Howlett Counsel for Respondent: Daniel V. O'Brien Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Reinhard, P.J., Karohl and Dowd, Jr., JJ., concur. Opinion: DIVISION SIX O R D E R Husband appeals from a decree dissolving the parties' marriage. He challenges the award of maintenance and the allocation of debt to the parties. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions