OTT LAW

Edward Barry, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Edward Barry, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. Case Number: 72778 & 72779 Handdown Date: 09/15/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Floyd McBride Counsel for Appellant: David Hemingway Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III and Karen Kramer Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Simon, P.J., Crane and Mooney, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Movant, Edward Barry, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions