OTT LAW

Gary Gandy, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Gary Gandy, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 71356 Handdown Date: 10/21/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Booker T. Shaw Counsel for Appellant: Dave Hemingway Counsel for Respondent: Jill Lahue Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J. and Crandall and Karohl, JJ., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Defendant, Gary Gandy, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions