George Hicks, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: George Hicks, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 73868 Handdown Date: 07/31/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Brendan Ryan Counsel for Appellant: Rosalynn Koch Counsel for Respondent: Breck K. Burgess Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Hoff, P.J., Gaertner and Russell, J.J., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Appellant, George Hicks, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, following appellant's conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, RSMo section 195.211 (1994). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. As no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion, we affirm the judgement pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
Rodney Lee Lincoln, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2014)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2104#ED100987
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Elizabeth M. Speer, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED113172