OTT LAW

Jodie Mahan, Petitioner/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Andrew Mahan, Respondent/Appellant/Cross-Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Jodie Mahan, Petitioner/Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Andrew Mahan, Respondent/Appellant/Cross-Respondent. Case Number: 72854 and 72935 Handdown Date: 06/16/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Melvyn W. Wiesman Counsel for Appellant: Joseph Howlett Counsel for Respondent: Ellen Watkins Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER In this dissolution case, the trial court dissolved the parties' marriage, divided the marital property, and awarded wife legal custody of the children. Husband appeals, raising four points and wife cross-appeals, raising one point.(FN1) We have reviewed the briefs, legal file, and transcript. The trial court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b). The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Footnote: FN1.Husband's appellate counsel was not his trial counsel.

Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions