OTT LAW

Lamont Washington, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Lamont Washington, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 72636 Handdown Date: 03/17/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis City, Hon. Robert H. Dierker, Jr. Counsel for Appellant: Dave Hemingway Counsel for Respondent: Elizabeth Ziegler Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: Movant appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief as untimely. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions