Mary Lee Rost, Petitioner/Respondent v. Kenneth F. Rost, Sr., Respondent/Appellant

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Mary Lee Rost, Petitioner/Respondent v. Kenneth F. Rost, Sr., Respondent/Appellant Case Number: No. 70938 Handdown Date: 05/13/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Osage County, Hon. Jeffrey W. Schaeperkoetter Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before: Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, J., and Gaertner, J. Opinion:

O R D E R Husband appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion to modify the child custody provision of a decree of dissolution. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.