Michael Kramer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Peggy Kramer, Respondent/Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Michael Kramer, Petitioner/Respondent, v. Peggy Kramer, Respondent/Appellant. Case Number: No. 70851 Handdown Date: 06/24/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Melvyn W. Wiesman Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, and Gaertner, JJ., concur. Opinion:

O R D E R Wife appeals from a decree dissolving the parties' marriage. She challenges the amount of maintenance and the court's finding that the parties' separation agreement was not unconscionable. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.