Michael Trice, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Michael Trice, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. Case Number: No. 71383 Handdown Date: 08/12/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Margaret M. Neill Counsel for Appellant: Dave Hemingway, Public Defender Counsel for Respondent: Cheryl A. Caponegro, Assistant Attorney General Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Reinhard, P.J., Karohl and Dowd, Jr., JJ., concur. Opinion: DIVISION SIX O R D E R Movant appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.