Reginald Cunningham, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Reginald Cunningham, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 73376 Handdown Date: 09/22/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Brendan Ryan Counsel for Appellant: Elizabeth Haines Counsel for Respondent: Kenneth P. Ferguson Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Pudlowski, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Ahrens, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Reginald Cunningham (Movant) appeals from the judgment overruling his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 after a hearing. Movant contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because his counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate his case and adequately consult with him. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.