OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio Woodson, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Antonio Woodson, Appellant. Case Number: 71201 Handdown Date: 10/28/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Paul McGhee Counsel for Appellant: Raymond J. Capelovitch Counsel for Respondent: Cheryl A. Caponegro Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Knaup Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant appeals the judgment entered pursuant to his jury conviction for first degree robbery, two counts of first degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions