State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gordon Rocholl, Appellant. Gordon Rocholl, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Gordon Rocholl, Appellant. Gordon Rocholl, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: Consolidated No. 68966 Handdown Date: 07/08/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Booker T. Shaw Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: Before Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard, and Gaertner, JJ. Opinion:

O R D E R Appellant, Gordon Rocholl, appeals the judgment of conviction for three counts of attempted sodomy, RSMo sections 566.060 (Cum.Supp. 1993) and 564.011 (1994), entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a bench trial.(FN1) We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision. Footnotes:

1. As defendant's brief raises no issues regarding the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion, his appeal from that

judgment is deemed abandoned. State v. Nelson, 818 S.W.2d 285, 287 (Mo.App.E.D. 1991). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.