OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Brian Daniels, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
James Brian Daniels
Respondent
State of Missouri

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Brian Daniels, Appellant. Case Number: 73031 Handdown Date: 10/20/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. John J. Riley Counsel for Appellant: Susan McGraugh Counsel for Respondent: Kevin P. Ferguson Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. J. Dowd, P.J., Crahan and Teitelman, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER James Brian Daniels appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction after a jury trial of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020, RSMo (1994), armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (1994), burglary in the first degree, Section 569.160 RSMo (1994), and sexual abuse, Section 566.100, RSMo (1994). On appeal, Daniels argues that the trial court erred in overruling his Batson challenge to the State's use of a peremptory strike to remove an African-American venireperson from the jury. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgement affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.