State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Brian Daniels, Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- James Brian Daniels
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James Brian Daniels, Appellant. Case Number: 73031 Handdown Date: 10/20/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. John J. Riley Counsel for Appellant: Susan McGraugh Counsel for Respondent: Kevin P. Ferguson Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. J. Dowd, P.J., Crahan and Teitelman, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER James Brian Daniels appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction after a jury trial of robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020, RSMo (1994), armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (1994), burglary in the first degree, Section 569.160 RSMo (1994), and sexual abuse, Section 566.100, RSMo (1994). On appeal, Daniels argues that the trial court erred in overruling his Batson challenge to the State's use of a peremptory strike to remove an African-American venireperson from the jury. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgement affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 566.100cited
Section 566.100, RSMo
- RSMo § 569.020cited
Section 569.020, RSMo
- RSMo § 569.160cited
Section 569.160 RSMo
- RSMo § 571.015cited
Section 571.015 RSMo
Rules
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John L. Sanders, Appellant(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Henry Loftis, Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Roger Addison, Defendant-Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arlandus Keyes, Defendant/Appellant. and Arlandus Keyes, Defendant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Orson L. Wells, Jr., Defendant/Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arthur Jackson, Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District