OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jermaine Jefferson, Appellant. Jermaine Jefferson, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Jermaine Jefferson, Appellant. Jermaine Jefferson, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 68582 Handdown Date: 08/05/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Daniel T. Tillman Counsel for Appellant: Douglas R. Hoff Counsel for Respondent: John Munson Morris, III and Christine M. Blegen Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Reinhard and Gaertner, JJ., concur. Opinion: O R D E R Appellant, Jermaine Jefferson ("defendant"), appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of one count of first degree assault, RSMo section 565.050 (1994), one count of first degree robbery, RSMo section 569.020 (1994), and two counts of armed criminal action, RSMo section 571.015 (1994). Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal files and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. Likewise, we find the decision of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgments pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions