OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John Forrest, Appellant. John Forrest, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John Forrest, Appellant. John Forrest, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: Nos. 69238 and 71464 Handdown Date: 09/16/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. John J. Riley Counsel for Appellant: Robert E. Steele, Jr. Counsel for Respondent: Gregory L. Barnes Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, P.J., Simon and Hoff, JJ., concur. Opinion: John Forrest appeals the judgment and sentences entered upon his convictions by a jury of two counts of second degree robbery, section 569.030 RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). In this consolidated matter, Forrest also appeals from the denial of his 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. The motion court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. The motion court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions