OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ross Miskell, Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Ross Miskell, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 69910 Handdown Date: 01/27/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Evelyn M. Baker Counsel for Appellant: Deborah B. Wafer Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, and Daniel G. Cierpiot Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of five counts of sodomy in violation of Section 566.060 RSMo 1994. He was sentenced to five consecutive terms of life imprisonment. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions