State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Victor Santiago, Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Victor Santiago
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Victor Santiago, Appellant. Case Number: 71685 Handdown Date: 04/21/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Washington County, Hon. Anthony Heckemeyer Counsel for Appellant: Renee Murphy and Susan Eckles Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, and Cristi A. Ingalsbe Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Grimm, P.J., Pudlowski and Gaertner, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Appellant, Victor Santiago ("defendant"), appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of first degree assault in violation of section 565.050, RSMo 1994, first degree burglary in violation of section 569.160, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 1994. The trial court found defendant to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced him to life imprisonment for first degree assault and a concurrent term of fifteen years for first degree burglary. The court further sentenced defendant to a consecutive term of life imprisonment for armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and transcript. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. Separate Opinion:
None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 565.050cited
section 565.050, RSMo
- RSMo § 569.160cited
section 569.160, RSMo
- RSMo § 571.015cited
section 571.015, RSMo
Rules
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Appellant, v. Stephen Jay Thorp, Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, vs. Sean D. Hibler, Defendant/Appellant.(2013)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictNovember 26, 2013#ED99285
State of Missouri, Respondent v. Joshua C. Vogel, Appellant(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Bsil Whitby, Defendant/Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Kyle Gardner, Defendant/Appellant. Kyle Gardner, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Darryl Davis, Defendant/Appellant.(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District